I recently had a client ask us to curate paths on some very cool topics. They were concerned that people were not finishing the whole path. That brought up a question – do paths need to be linear? Should they be? What is the right way to build competency?
Of course, if you are seeking certification in a topic or set of topics, that is a different focus. That path must include steps, assessments and completions. But what about continuous learning?
I contend that effective learning paths have the following components:
· Provide answers
· Present different types of solutions
· Build curiosity
Let me translate that into L&D speak: a curriculum needs to build skills using different modalities and build engagement.
We need to provide internal and external content that is:
· Just for me
· Just in time
· Just right
L&D translation: personalized, accessible and right modality.
And, the biggest change of all, we need to move from a push mentality to a pull mentality. Stop pushing out what we think is right. Go back to performance consulting, listen and make continuous learning accessible.
As I have said before, we are in the midst of a revolution, but that does not mean that only the new ideas work. Elephant in the room, this means change.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Catch the wave of disruption in Learning
April 14, 2017
Workflow learning, 70/20/10, micro learning, ecosystems:
Is there a silver bullet for Digital/Modern Learning?